Client Letter Regarding Second Quarter 2016 Tax Developments

Dear Client:

The following is a summary of important tax developments that have occurred in the past three months that may affect you, your family, your investments and your livelihood. Please call us for more information about any of these developments and what steps you should implement to take advantage of favorable developments and to minimize the impact of those that are unfavorable.

Date extended for employers to claim revived work opportunity tax credit. The Code Sec. 51 work opportunity tax credit allows employers who hire members of certain “targeted groups” to get a credit against income tax. The credit was retroactively revived by the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015. The previous transitional relief for eligible employers who want to claim credit has been extended. The transitional relief gives employers three extra months — until Sept. 28, 2016 — to file the forms necessary to claim the credit for certain eligible workers. An employer who hires a member of a targeted group, including a long-term unemployment recipient who begins work for that employer on or after Sept. 1, 2016, is not eligible for this transitional relief with respect to any such new hire.

Taxpayers can pay IRS in cash at 7-Elevens.
The IRS announced a new payment option for individual taxpayers who need to pay their taxes with cash. Under the new arrangement that the IRS provides in partnership with ACI Worldwide’s OfficialPayments.com and the PayNearMe Company, individuals can make a payment without the need of a bank account or credit card at over 7,000 7-Eleven stores. There is a $1,000 payment limit per day and a $3.99 fee per payment. Because PayNearMe involves a 3-step process, the IRS urges taxpayers choosing this option to start the process well ahead of the tax deadline to avoid interest and penalty charges.

Court rules Obamacare reimbursements unconstitutional. A district court has granted summary judgment to the House of Representatives in their challenge to the funding of a health insurance providers’ reimbursements in the Affordable Care Act (ACA, i.e., Obamacare). While the ACA explicitly provides a permanent appropriation for the Code Sec. 36B premium tax credit, which makes insurance premiums more affordable for low-income taxpayers, such funding is not specified for the reimbursements of “cost-sharing reductions” by insurers that reduce deductibles, coinsurance, co-payments, and similar charges in the qualified health plans they offer through an Exchange. The court found that the ACA impermissibly appropriated money for the reimbursements to insurers in violation of the Constitution, which requires that such monies can only be appropriated by Congress. The court enjoined any further reimbursements until a valid appropriation was in place, but stayed its injunction pending an appeal by the parties.

Social Security wage base could increase to $126,000 for 2017. The Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Actuary (OCA) has projected, under two out of three of its methods of forecasting, that the Social Security wage base will increase from $118,500 for 2016 to $126,000 for 2017. Based on the OCA estimate, for a salary of $126,000 (or more), an employee and his or her employer would each pay $7,812.00 in Social Security tax in 2017. Based on the OCA estimate, a self-employed person with at least $126,000 in net self-employment earnings would pay $15,624.00 for the Social Security part of the self-employment tax in 2017.

No deduction for clothing. The Tax Court held that a salesman for a major designer who was required to wear the designer’s apparel while representing the company could not deduct the cost of such clothing as non-reimbursed employee expenses. Clothing worn by a taxpayer in connection with his or her trade or business is generally nondeductible, unless:

1. The clothing is required or essential in the taxpayer’s employment;
2. The clothing is not suitable for general or personal wear;
3. The clothing is not so worn. Here, the clothing was clearly suitable for regular wear.

3 thoughts on “Client Letter Regarding Second Quarter 2016 Tax Developments

  1. I simply must tell you that you have written an excellent and unique article that I really enjoyed reading. I’m fascinated by how well you laid out your material and presented your views. Thank you.

  2. I do trust all of the ideas you’ve introduced on your post. They’re very convincing and will certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are too brief for starters. May you please prolong them a little from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *